The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT Examination) is one of the most respected and prestigious examinations. Due to the high stakes involved in the examination, even a minor inconvenience can disrupt the environment of the examination, leading to stress and anxiety among the students. Something similar happened in the Common Law Admission Test-Undergraduate 2025 Examination. The CLAT UG 2025 Examination suffered multiple allegations and widespread debate due to disputed questions. Both candidates and examiners filed multiple petitions in the High Courts, which ultimately reached the Supreme Court, waiting to be served a landmark judgement. A final verdict has been announced on the petitions by the Supreme Court. This blog will guide you through the important aspects of the verdict and help you structure your journey accordingly.
The CLAT-UG 2025 Dispute
The Common Law Admission Test was allegedly faced with multiple accusations and controversial debates on ambiguous and potentially erroneous questions. In a highly competitive examination such as the CLAT-UG 2025 Examination, even a single mark can significantly affect the ranks of the candidates. Such small mistakes can easily alter the career paths of the candidates. Reportedly, it was found that the candidates raised concerns about certain questions. Candidates believed that there were multiple answers to some of the questions or were simply too ambiguous to have a single correct answer. This led to the filing of multiple petitions and further drew the attention of the Supreme Court to these matters. The Supreme Court ultimately took the authority to resolve the issues and serve a final verdict on the petitions filed.
The Supreme Court’s Landmark Verdicts on CLAT-UG 2025
After careful inspection of the matter, the Supreme Court ruled out a verdict on the disputed questions, ensuring smooth and fair competition among the candidates. The detailed analysis of the disputed question has been discussed below.
- Question 56: Both Option C and Option D will be considered the correct answers for this question. This ensured a significant relief for the candidates who had the fear of losing their marks despite choosing the correct answer.
- Question 77: The Supreme Court rejected the High Court’s petition to delete this question. The Supreme Court stated that the question was fair enough to be evaluated and maintain consistency in the examination.
- Question 88: The question was found to be faulty and irrelevant and was therefore deleted. Marks will be awarded to candidates irrespective of the fact whether they have attempted the question or not.
- Question 115: Similar to question number 88, this question was also found to be flawed, and therefore, it has been decided to delete this question.
- Question 116: This question also faced several allegations and was ultimately removed from the question paper.
This step reflected the Supreme Court’s approach and efforts to restore fairness and transparency in the question paper. Fair resolutions have been provided to the questions that were found to be flawed and ambiguous in the question paper.
What will be the impacts on CLAT-UG 2025 Scores and Ranks?
Due to the verdict served by the Supreme Court, the candidates will suffer a substantial impact on their final scores and ranks. Check out below to have a closer look at the impacts:
- As the Supreme Court has deleted three questions, it has been decided that marks will be awarded for the same to every candidate. This will help the candidates receive additional marks irrespective of their response.
- Candidates who initially lost their marks due to these questions will see a significant rise in their ranks and scores, while those who have attempted the questions might experience a slight dip in their ranks. In competitive examinations like the CLAT Examination, even a single mark can alter the ranks of the candidates.
- Candidates can also experience a slight influence on the cut-off marks across various NLUS.
- Due to the revised scores and ranks, candidates will need to undergo the counselling process once again.
What are the steps to be taken by the Aspirants after the Supreme Court’s Verdict?
Candidates must follow some essential steps after the verdict served by the Supreme Court. Given below are some measures in the wake of the verdict:
- Candidates must keep checking the official website of the Consortium of National Law Universities for any further official notifications.
- Learn from this experience and try focusing on the areas that require further attention and preparation to improve your score further in any competitive examinations.
- Do not be overexcited or disappointed by the verdict served by the Supreme Court. Remember that this is the first step towards your legal career and you need to focus on your broader goals.
FAQs
Yes, the verdict on deleting the questions and ruling out multiple correct options for the questions will affect the final ranks of the candidates based on their raw performances or scores.
The Consortium of NLUS is expected to release the scores very soon, but as for now, the candidates can calculate their revised scores based on the updated answer key released by the Consortium of NLUS.
No, the judgment served by the Supreme Court is the final verdict, and no candidate can further challenge the decision of the Supreme Court.
Yes, most probably, there can be delays in the counselling process due to the verdict served by the Supreme Court, but the Consortium of NLUS will try to act swiftly to release the updated scores and ranks.
According to the verdict served by the Supreme Court, the marks for the deleted questions will be awarded to all the candidates, whether they have attempted the question or not.